The Not so Ugly Truth About the V-Tail
In my search for a plane I landed on the Bonanza A36. The same plane that Matt is flying around the world! But in the process quite the debate started with the V-tail.
In Defense of the V-Tail Bonanza, Paul says...
"The v-tail is overbuilt to the Utility standard, stressed to higher g factors, ultimate load factors etc....has been since 1949.
The v-tail enjoys a relatively good safety record despite the hyperbole surrounding "that funny tail,"
The vtail is by far the most tested, examined,scrutinized airplane flying. The only civil aero plane built with real wind tunnel aerodynamics as a large part of its design. Dive testing to 300 mph. Drop testing of the landing gear (dropping the airplane 20 ft or so, I forget, to test its ruggedness (all that did was pop the tires) There were many built (10,400 approx) and thus the pool is quite large. Accident statistics can be presented that are scary to the uninformed observer.
There was a rash of airplanes spit out the bottom of some thunderstorms, in pieces, or found to have poorly balanced or non balanced tail surfaces after painting or changes to its weight (maintenance induced flutter) that contributed to this run of inflight break ups. More than 70% of them involved convective activity in some way. Regardless, for a time, there was as opened restriction while Beech tried to find out what was going on. They found nothing.they were told to try again or the FAA would take over. They loaded it to gross weight......
Took It to every extreme imaginable.
The only finding was some flutter at a very narrow corner of the envelope. Hard to configure but nevertheless it was obtainable. They put a small cuff on the leading edge joint of the horizontal stab and the fuselage to protect against flutter, but more importantly...demanded that every vtail get their tail surfaces balanced, and to a tighter specification. In inch/pounds 16.8 to 19.6 or close to that. An Airworthiness Directive was issued to mandate inspection of the tail, installation of the aforementioned cuff, and repeated inspections every 100 hrs of the tail...it also mandated rebalance of the ruddervators after painting, etc.
In my search for a plane I landed on the Bonanza A36. The same plane that Matt is flying around the world! But in the process quite the debate started with the V-tail.
In Defense of the V-Tail Bonanza, Paul says...
"The v-tail is overbuilt to the Utility standard, stressed to higher g factors, ultimate load factors etc....has been since 1949.
The v-tail enjoys a relatively good safety record despite the hyperbole surrounding "that funny tail,"
The vtail is by far the most tested, examined,scrutinized airplane flying. The only civil aero plane built with real wind tunnel aerodynamics as a large part of its design. Dive testing to 300 mph. Drop testing of the landing gear (dropping the airplane 20 ft or so, I forget, to test its ruggedness (all that did was pop the tires) There were many built (10,400 approx) and thus the pool is quite large. Accident statistics can be presented that are scary to the uninformed observer.
There was a rash of airplanes spit out the bottom of some thunderstorms, in pieces, or found to have poorly balanced or non balanced tail surfaces after painting or changes to its weight (maintenance induced flutter) that contributed to this run of inflight break ups. More than 70% of them involved convective activity in some way. Regardless, for a time, there was as opened restriction while Beech tried to find out what was going on. They found nothing.they were told to try again or the FAA would take over. They loaded it to gross weight......
Took It to every extreme imaginable.
The only finding was some flutter at a very narrow corner of the envelope. Hard to configure but nevertheless it was obtainable. They put a small cuff on the leading edge joint of the horizontal stab and the fuselage to protect against flutter, but more importantly...demanded that every vtail get their tail surfaces balanced, and to a tighter specification. In inch/pounds 16.8 to 19.6 or close to that. An Airworthiness Directive was issued to mandate inspection of the tail, installation of the aforementioned cuff, and repeated inspections every 100 hrs of the tail...it also mandated rebalance of the ruddervators after painting, etc.
At the same time as this, there was an emphasis put on weather and weather avoidance in pilot training, along with the first generations of spherics, lightning detectors that helped pilots AVOID T-storms and bad weather in general. Convective activity, sigmets and other tools became available. This is all in the early to mid 80s.
Well, the result of all this has been the Bonanza now having one of the better safety records among high-perf complex airplanes...with the only inflight break ups over the last 20 yrs occurring, according to NTSB reports, with convective activity, and loss of control resulting in overspeed and exceeding the airplane's ultimate load factor as causal factors.
The V Tail bonanza is a safe airplane. It's as safe as the pilot can make it. The tails don't "just fall off". I've been asked this question at an airshow once. In the inflight break ups studied, the tail never did "just fall off" anyway. Upon exceeding the Maximum Load factor the wings would fail first, followed by the tail.
The Maximum load Factor on the Bonanza is roughly 16% higher than the rest of the civilian fleet of airplanes as Walter Beech chose to illustrate its structural integrity by building the airframe to the Utility standard, rather than the Normal standard that Cessna, Piper, and all other certified civilian airplanes were built. This means you enjoy an ultimate load factor of 8g. This comes to inflight loads of over 11 tons as they also chose to keep the airframe certified in the Utility category at full gross weight, as well.
Well, I just sitting around and decided to give you my little story about the Bonanza and Debonair. Yes, they are strong. And safe.
I've decided if anyone asks me if the tails fall off, I'm going to answer, "Yep, with no warning! I've been lucky so far, but TODAY, WELL, YOU NEVER KNOW!!!!!!"
Enjoy the Journey!
XO Karlene
It's more expensive but isn't the Cirrus the most safest aircraft, having the parachute
ReplyDeleteThanks Kevin. I was looking at a Cirrus... but the plane I wanted was $795,000!!! A bit more expensive for sure. :)
DeleteDoes it have to be new ?
DeleteI still suggest the Cirrus for the safety factor esp with your girls and their kids.
I'm sure you must know engineers who could check it all out for you
Good Luck
It doesn't have to be new, but there are not enough seats and not sure about the useful load... for what I would like to do with it. I'm meeting the CEO of Cirrus next month. Keep watching... you can be invited too!!!
DeleteOk, well which ever one you choose consider getting in touch with this company http://brsparachutes.com/brs_aviation_home.aspx
DeleteKarlene,
ReplyDeleteJust as an FYI, my 1966 Cessna 150 was certified in the Utility category, which is a good thing as much abuse as they sometimes take during instruction. Hope your search goes well for a BE36. The market is depressed right now, so could find some good deals.
Thank you. I keep looking but it seems like prices are still high. But maybe everyone is just pricing off each other. A 150 Utility certified sounds like a great plane.
DeleteBINGO! An aircraft is just as safe as the pilot makes it! I hope to fly a V-tail one day. Looks like an amazing aircraft just like many, many others. Thank you so much for a very informative post.
ReplyDeleteWe had a V-tail at our flying event. Beautiful plane. And it smelled how an airplane should smell. She was an old one, but beautiful.
DeleteI used to work for a Beech dealer in Michigan '79-80 or so. We knew the V-tail Bonaza as the "fork tailed doctor killer" only because doctors (some of the few individuals with enough disposable income to buy one, and often an ego to match) had a tendency to exceed their own aeronautical abilities in an airplane that could fly faster than they could control one.
ReplyDeleteI was aware of one that would fly IFR before his instrument rating. It's really no wonder that some of them got spit out from thunderstorms in pieces.
Yes, and a friend calls Dr.s Bonanza killers. Yes...Ego and exceeding performance will get you every time. Sometimes you just have to shake your head at what people do.
DeleteThe V-Tail.
ReplyDeleteWhat a journey,from Beech A36 TO F-117!
And I'm going to check out a Cirrus soon. But need to win the lottery first!
DeleteHi Karlene
ReplyDeleteDid you happen to see this great news
Everybody walked away
http://www.kathrynsreport.com/2014/05/cirrus-sr22-n802dk-cirrus-design-corp.html
Wow... very cool!!!
Delete